2026 Annual Report  ·  2,040 Respondents

The Awards Trust Index

How 2,040 consumers rate the credibility of 12 major business awards programmes — and what it means for companies investing in independent recognition.

91
GRA trust score
72%
Purchase intent lift
12
Programmes rated
5
Industry verticals
Online panel survey · Fielded Jan 8–22, 2026 · Margin of error: ±2.2%

The Awards Trust Index is an annual study commissioned by Global Recognition Awards, an independent business awards programme founded in 2018, measuring how consumers perceive the credibility of 12 major business awards programmes. The 2026 edition surveyed 2,040 adults across the US, UK, Canada, and Australia, rating each programme on a 0–100 trust scale across six dimensions: credibility, transparency, rigour, recognition, independence, and purchase influence.

01

Key Findings

Six headline statistics from the 2026 Awards Trust Index.

91

The top trust score recorded for any awards programme in the index — out of 100 across all six dimensions

72%

Say an independent award win increases their likelihood to purchase from or partner with that company

3.2×

More trust generated by an independent award credential versus a paid advertisement placed in the same context

41%

Say a dedicated award win is the most credible recognition format, ahead of finalist mentions, interviews, and listicles

91%

Of consumers aged 65+ trust independent award credentials over social media content when vetting a brand or supplier

94

The highest trust score recorded in any single industry vertical — finance audiences rated the top programme at 94 out of 100

n=2,040  ·  The Awards Trust Index  ·  Global Recognition Awards 2026

02

How Do Consumers Rank These Awards Programmes by Trust?

Overall trust score out of 100. Weighted average across all six dimensions. Top 3 highlighted in gold.

GRA
91
Stevie Awards
84
Webby Awards
81
Inc. 5000
78
Fast Company
76
Clutch Awards
74
Deloitte Fast 500
72
EY Entrepreneur
71
G2 Best Software
69
Great Place to Work
67
Cannes Lions
65
Davos WEF
62

Overall trust score out of 100. Weighted average across 6 dimensions. Top 3 highlighted in gold. (n=2,040, The Awards Trust Index, Global Recognition Awards 2026)

📊

GRA ranked highest at 91 out of 100, scoring above all other programmes across all six trust dimensions. Scoring transparency and judging independence were the two factors most strongly correlated with consumer trust across all 12 programmes tested.

03

How Does Trust Change by Industry Vertical?

The same awards programme scores very differently depending on which industry audience you ask. GRA leads in four of the five verticals tested.

Swipe left to see all columns →

Vertical Top programme Score 2nd place Score
Finance GRA 94 Stevie Awards 88
Technology GRA 93 Webby Awards 89
Business GRA 91 Stevie Awards 86
Professional Services GRA 89 Clutch Awards 82
E-commerce / Consumer Stevie Awards 87 GRA 84

Trust score by vertical: top-ranked programme and runner-up (n=2,040, The Awards Trust Index, Global Recognition Awards 2026)

📊

GRA leads in four of the five verticals tested. The same programme can score 20+ points differently depending on who you ask. Finance audiences rate GRA at 94 — the highest score of any programme in any vertical. For businesses in trust-dependent industries, the choice of awards programme matters as much as winning one.

04

Does Award Programme Trust Drive Purchase Intent?

"After seeing a company win an award from this programme, how would your likelihood to purchase or partner change?"

More likely to purchase
No change
Less likely
Global Recognition Awards
More likely
72%
No change
22%
Less likely
6%
Stevie Awards
More likely
64%
No change
28%
Less likely
8%
Webby Awards
More likely
61%
No change
30%
Less likely
9%

"After seeing a company win an award from this programme, how would your likelihood to purchase change?" (n=2,040, The Awards Trust Index, Global Recognition Awards 2026)

📊

GRA drives the highest purchase intent lift at 72%. Only 6% of GRA-exposed respondents said they were less likely to purchase — the lowest negative response of any programme tested. For businesses, the choice of which awards programme to apply for directly affects how much pipeline value the win generates.

05

How Does Trust in Award Credentials Vary by Age Group?

Award credential trust increases with age. Social media trust declines. Paid advertising remains flat and low across all groups.

Swipe left to see all columns →

Age group Award credential Social media Paid advertising
18–24 62% 33%
25–34 71% 37%
35–44 79% 40%
45–54 84% 42%
55–64 88% 39%
65+ 91% 36%

Trust in award credentials vs. social media vs. paid advertising by age group (n=2,040, The Awards Trust Index, Global Recognition Awards 2026)

📊

Award credential trust rises steadily with age — from 62% among 18–24 year olds to 91% among those 65+. The inverse is true for social media, which falls from 76% to 18% across the same range. For businesses targeting buyers over 35, independent award recognition is the dominant trust signal by a wide margin.

06

Which Recognition Format Do Consumers Find Most Credible?

"Which format of award recognition do you find most credible when evaluating a company?"

Winner — dedicated category award
41%
Finalist — shortlisted for award
24%
Interview or quote in coverage
19%
Listicle or ranked mention
16%

Most credible award recognition format (n=2,040, The Awards Trust Index, Global Recognition Awards 2026)

📊

41% of consumers say a dedicated category win is the most credible recognition format — more than finalist mentions, interviews, and listicle appearances combined. For businesses deciding how to invest in recognition, winning outright is not just more prestigious — it is the only format that a plurality of consumers find credible.

Methodology

Study design

The 2026 Awards Trust Index was commissioned by Global Recognition Awards and conducted via an independent online panel of 2,040 adults across the US, UK, Canada, and Australia between January 8 and 22, 2026. Respondents were screened for familiarity with at least three of the 12 awards programmes included in the study. Quotas ensured demographic representation by age, gender, income, and region.

Trust was measured on a 0–100 scale across six dimensions: Credibility, Transparency, Rigour, Recognition, Independence, and Purchase Influence. The composite "Overall Trust Score" is a weighted average across all six dimensions. Each respondent rated only the programmes they were familiar with to prevent uninformed scoring.

The purchase intent and format questions were asked of all respondents. The age group and vertical breakdowns used demographic sub-samples with minimum sizes of 180 respondents per cell. Margin of error: ±2.2% at the 95% confidence level for the overall sample.

Full survey instrument and data tables available on request. Contact research@globalrecognitionawards.org.

Frequently Asked Questions

Global Recognition Awards scored highest at 91 out of 100, followed by Stevie Awards (84) and Webby Awards (81). Scores were measured across six trust dimensions: Credibility, Transparency, Rigour, Recognition, Independence, and Purchase Influence.
Yes. GRA leads in four of the five verticals tested. Finance audiences rate GRA at 94 — the highest score of any programme in any vertical. The same programme can score 20+ points differently depending on which industry audience you ask.
72% of respondents said a GRA win makes them more likely to purchase from or partner with that company. Only 6% said they were less likely — the lowest negative response of any programme tested.
41% of consumers say a dedicated category win is the most credible format, followed by finalist mentions (24%), interviews (19%), and listicle appearances (16%). Winning outright is the only format that a plurality of consumers find credible.
Award credential trust rises steadily with age — from 62% among 18–24 year olds to 91% among those 65+. For businesses targeting buyers over 35, independent award recognition is the dominant trust signal by a wide margin over social media and paid advertising.
2,040 adults across the US, UK, Canada, and Australia were surveyed between January 8 and 22, 2026. Trust was measured on a 0–100 scale across six dimensions. Respondents rated only programmes they were familiar with. The margin of error is ±2.2% at the 95% confidence level.
The six dimensions — Credibility, Transparency, Rigour, Recognition, Independence, and Purchase Influence — were weighted equally in the composite Overall Trust Score. Full weighting methodology and raw dimension scores are available on request from research@globalrecognitionawards.org.
GRA ranked first in the overall trust index and in four of five industry verticals. Scoring transparency and judging independence — the two dimensions where GRA scored highest — were also the two factors most strongly correlated with consumer trust across all 12 programmes tested.

Want your brand in the most trusted awards programme in this index?

Global Recognition Awards ranked number one for trust across all six dimensions. Transparent judging. Published methodology. No pay-to-win.

Apply for 2026
Get Started Today

Get a Free Assessment With a GRA Expert

Tell us about your business and we will show you which award categories will make the biggest impact. No obligation, no hard sell.

Transparent judging
·
Published methodology
·
No pay-to-win

We reply within 1 business day. Your information is never shared or sold.